Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18A009677 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16926 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2011 19:31:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 16671 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2011 19:31:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 16664 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2011 19:31:40 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:31:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [10.0.0.88]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username rdonkin, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:31:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4EBC265D.3060007@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:30:37 +0000 From: Robert Burrell Donkin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111030 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: Is there a legal 'pmc'? ... References: <4EAFF919.70804@apache.org> <4EB040D0.1090107@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/01/11 22:07, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> I guess I miss parsed your question. I thought you were asking for a >> schema which described how licenses are to be categorized. Instead >> you were asking for a schema as to how to ask such questions. >> >> JIRA is an appropriate place to ask questions of the form you describe >> above. I agree that that that is a frequently asked question. >> > > RIght. We are now on the same page. I can save people from sending > these questions to legal-discuss@ and getting completely disoriented > by 5 conflicting opinions, four of them from people who are neither > lawyers nor members of the legal affairs committee. Nobody - whether officers, lawyers, members - gives legal opinions on legal-discuss. This is a discussion list. It may be confusing and disorienting to some that licenses and copyright are often quite debatable subjects. IMO The best response when confused is to ask more questions until you understand why people think the issue is worthy of discussion. > To be fair, this > is more of a problem with more exotic questions than license > questions. Do you have any examples in mind? Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org