www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Question regarding dual licensing and the CPL
Date Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:55:07 GMT
It's got the CPL since that's its original license, and then our
modifications are on the ASL. So that's one Cat A and one Cat B. Is there
anything in particular we need to do for that?

A.

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>wrote:

> What's the other dual-license? As long as one is cat A you would be OK.
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi -
> > One of the class files in the new Bigtop incubator project
> > (
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/trunk/test/src/itest-common/src/main/groovy/com/cloudera/itest/junit/OrderedParameterized.java
> )
> > is a derivate of a JUnit class, and so is dual-licensed with the CPL. But
> > the CPL is a Category B license on
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html -
> > which suggests that we at the very least don't want to include it, and if
> > possible, we should not use it. So does this mean we need to rewrite the
> > class or get rid of it entirely? I'm not sure what the right process
> would
> > be here. Thanks!
> > A.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message