www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Burrell Donkin <rdon...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-96) Categorise Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
Date Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:35:00 GMT
On 08/05/11 21:04, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

> In the case of Apache OOo, the question comes up because the OpenOffice.org site has
some documentation 
> (of the end-user or other-contributor kind, I believe) that is dual-licensed CC-by 3.0
(or later) and GPL.  
> Not sure why GPL for documentation.

Were these documents to be compiled into a work, section 4.a in CC-by
might well prevent that work being licensed under the GPL.

Robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message