Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <1311680081.20781.2349.camel@linux-krcc.site>
References: <1311510345.20781.923.camel@linux-krcc.site>
	<CAFG6u8F9mTwsRbAwm0TGpm1Px3MDNWRfBJccitz5JfZSG=661g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1311680081.20781.2349.camel@linux-krcc.site>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:26:32 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAFG6u8EzkZhXKy7Qq5HKR6p+m18fSm9j7Fs01+GidW815Kskqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org branding
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Graham Lauder <yorick_@openoffice.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 15:54 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Graham Lauder <yorick_@openoffice.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Does Apache have an agreement with the Apache Tribal Nation to use the
>> > name on globally marketed consumer products.
>>
>> It might be worth asking this question separately.... and also include
>> the results of whatever research you may have done on what specific
>> Trademarks the Apache Tribal Nation may have and why you believe that
>> there might be confusion in the case of an Office product.
>
> I take it that's a "no" then.

Um, that's a bit... rude.

Trademarks simply are not my area of expertise.

- Sam Ruby

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org