Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94E7370BF for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5591 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2011 20:48:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 5369 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2011 20:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 5362 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2011 20:48:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:48:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 203.97.33.64 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of yorick_@openoffice.org) Received: from [203.97.33.64] (HELO smtp3.clear.net.nz) (203.97.33.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:48:22 +0000 Received: from [218.101.69.170] (218-101-69-170.dialup.clear.net.nz [218.101.69.170]) by smtp3.clear.net.nz (CLEAR Net Mail) with ESMTP id <0LOY00B7KKFYA500@smtp3.clear.net.nz> for legal-discuss@apache.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:48:00 +1200 (NZST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:50:53 +1200 From: Graham Lauder Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org branding In-reply-to: To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-id: <1311713453.20781.2935.camel@linux-krcc.site> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <1311510345.20781.923.camel@linux-krcc.site> <1311680081.20781.2349.camel@linux-krcc.site> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:26 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Graham Lauder wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 15:54 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Graham Lauder wrote: > >> > >> > Does Apache have an agreement with the Apache Tribal Nation to use the > >> > name on globally marketed consumer products. > >> > >> It might be worth asking this question separately.... and also include > >> the results of whatever research you may have done on what specific > >> Trademarks the Apache Tribal Nation may have and why you believe that > >> there might be confusion in the case of an Office product. > > > > I take it that's a "no" then. > > Um, that's a bit... rude. Please, many apologies if I offended, it wasn't supposed to be rude just what I deduced from your remark > > Trademarks simply are not my area of expertise. Fair enough, I've sent a mail to trademarks@. With a little luck they'll be able to clarify. The one thing that we have onside is that "Apache" has been used by others: Boeing obviously for the helicopter and an offshore power boat manufacturer over which there was a Federal court battle for ownership of the TM. That was with another boat manufacturer however. Boeing use is obviously very high profile but I haven't been able to find any mention of them having any deal with the Apache Tribal Nation over it's use. It may not ever be an issue, but experiences at this end of the world just makes me a little wary. Cheers GL > > - Sam Ruby > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > -- Graham Lauder, OpenOffice.org MarCon (Marketing Contact) NZ http://marketing.openoffice.org/contacts.html OpenOffice.org Migration and training Consultant. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org