www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Cowan <co...@mercury.ccil.org>
Subject Re: IP Clearance
Date Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:18:09 GMT
Chris Travers scripsit:

> However at the same time, I had customers on SQL-Ledger to support and
> I couldn't do that on SQL-Ledger given the security holes we had found
> and the difficulty in getting them fixed.  So my obligations to my
> customers had to override the idea that it's far better if everyone
> just gets along.

Quite so.  But ASF has no such obligations to its users, AFAIK.

-- 
John Cowan   cowan@ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British
Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence
of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1.  I doubt if
the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of
equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message