Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49607 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2011 21:28:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2011 21:28:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 94066 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2011 21:28:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 93920 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2011 21:28:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 93912 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2011 21:28:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:28:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 76.96.30.40 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com) Received: from [76.96.30.40] (HELO qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:28:48 +0000 Received: from omta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.44]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3xSi1g0020x6nqcA4xUUCN; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:28:28 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.84.64]) by omta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3xUS1g0071PGofZ8YxUTVu; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:28:28 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Policy suggestions for associated marks? From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:28:25 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <7D9D519B-65B4-444F-80D5-FBD516BF1D57@jaguNET.com> References: <4D4C6191.70104@shanecurcuru.org> To: legal-discuss@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> The Subversion community has said "use 'svn' as you like. we don't care." >> >> Not sure that we need anything more formal than that. >> > > +1 The Maven PMC would likely say the same thing. > Except that, in the case of subversion, the ASF is simply continuing to abide by a policy that it *inherited*. Just cause subversion can do this doesn't mean that Maven is allowed to (or should be, imo). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org