www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris A. Mattmann (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-86) Artistic License / CPAN dependencies
Date Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:26:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12997283#comment-12997283
] 

Chris A. Mattmann commented on LEGAL-86:
----------------------------------------

Hi All -- any resolution on this? Sam? Comments? This is seriously hindering our Lucy Incubator
first release and a resolution would help us not have to go through any more effort to side-track
these dependencies.

Cheers,
Chris


> Artistic License / CPAN dependencies
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-86
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-86
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Marvin Humphrey
>
> The Apache Lucy Incubator podling is working to pare down its list of
> dependencies, but there are two CPAN distributions which we would like to 
> put off replacing for the time being (Parse::RecDescent and JSON::XS).
> These two distributions are both licensed, as is common for CPAN modules,
> under the "same terms as Perl itself".  Perl's licensing is here:
>     [http://dev.perl.org/licenses/]
> We do not wish to bundle these CPAN distributions with Lucy, but instead
> specify them as prerequisites.  We assert that our usage of the modules in
> question falls under the terms of the Artistic License and *not* the GPL.
> Lucy interfaces with these modules in three places:
>     * At build time (Parse::RecDescent).
>     * Within Lucy itself at runtime (JSON::XS).
>     * Within sample/cookbook code (Parse::RecDescent).
> We have two questions:
>     * Is it acceptable for code released under the Apache License 2.0 to have
>       a non-optional dependency on code which is licensed under the Artistic
>       License?
>     * Is it acceptable to classify these modules as "system dependencies",
>       which the user is expected to install?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message