www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: NOTICE file dispute
Date Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:55:49 GMT
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Over in the Apache Felix project we are uncertain about the requirement
> to list included artifacts in the NOTICE file or not.
>
> In the concrete example, it is about the KXML2 library which is
> BSD-style licensed. In this license there's a sentence:
>
>    The  above copyright notice and this permission notice
>    shall be included in all copies or substantial portions
>    of the Software.
>
> I would say, that this sentence does not require us to list that
> artifact in the NOTICE file (of course we include the license in the
> LICENSE file).
>
> Am I wrong ?
>

Its come up before and I think current consensus is that you are
correct, eg http://apache.markmail.org/message/u66o5ucyfquxjl7i

   ...ant

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message