Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47939 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 12:35:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 12:35:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 75837 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2010 12:35:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 75406 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2010 12:35:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 75399 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2010 12:35:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1534.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5LCZRHC026007 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:27 GMT Message-ID: <2143557.109101277123727584.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:35:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sebb (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-77) What does "appropriately labeled" mean? In-Reply-To: <28402967.103741277080282680.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12880803#action_12880803 ] Sebb commented on LEGAL-77: --------------------------- OK, so can something similar be added to the FAQ page please? If the requirements vary between licences, then IMO the page should say which cat B licences need a mention in NOTICE and which only need a copy of the licence in LICENSE (or whatever the possible options are). Otherwise there are going to be mistakes and/or wasted effort trying to understand what is required. > What does "appropriately labeled" mean? > --------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-77 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-77 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Sebb > > The Legal FAQ page says that binary code under a category B license "may be included in binary form within an Apache product if the inclusion is appropriately labeled:" but gives no hints as to how to provide such labelling. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org