www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-76) Can we include binary copies of JavaMail and JAF in distributions?
Date Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:33:24 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12880633#action_12880633

Stefano Bagnara commented on LEGAL-76:

@Sebb OT about sun vs geronimo implementations: Almost an year ago I did port "apache james"
(email server) from sun specific code to generic api code and reported a few bugs to the geronimo
team and they solved and promptly released fixed versions. Now the full testsuite works with
both implementations, so you could give it a try.

> Can we include binary copies of JavaMail and JAF in distributions?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-76
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-76
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Sebb
> Is the JavaMail license compatible with category B?
> It is not released under SPL as far as I can tell.
> The license is at:
> http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/downloads/index.html
> Click download
> Click JavaMail License Agreement.
> Similarly for Javabeans Activation Framework (JAF):
> http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javabeans/jaf/downloads/

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message