www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-76) Can we include binary copies of JavaMail and JAF in distributions?
Date Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:37:22 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12880461#action_12880461
] 

Henri Yandell commented on LEGAL-76:
------------------------------------

Go build the CDDL JavaMail version from svn tag and stick that binary in the maven repo. Or
use Geronimo's.

Sun do this weird thing where they offer the same thing under multiple licenses depending
on where they get it from.

+1 to the Sun proprietary license not being useable.

> Can we include binary copies of JavaMail and JAF in distributions?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-76
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-76
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Sebb
>
> Is the JavaMail license compatible with category B?
> It is not released under SPL as far as I can tell.
> The license is at:
> http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/downloads/index.html
> Click download
> Click JavaMail License Agreement.
> Similarly for Javabeans Activation Framework (JAF):
> http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javabeans/jaf/downloads/

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message