www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-69) Question about specific distribution permissions for Docbook files in the Apache OFBiz project
Date Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:56:25 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858287#action_12858287

Jacques Le Roux commented on LEGAL-69:


We received this answer from Norman Walsh 

"Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> writes:
> Could you please give us some enlightenments in order to hopefully
> close the Jira issue above and remove the mentionned section

I'm confused. If you look in the schema, you'll find:

# Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute the DocBook schema
# and its accompanying documentation for any purpose and without fee
# is hereby granted in perpetuity, provided that the above copyright
# notice and this paragraph appear in all copies. The copyright
# holders make no representation about the suitability of the schema
# for any purpose. It is provided "as is" without expressed or implied
# warranty.
# If you modify the DocBook schema in any way, label your schema as a
# variant of DocBook. See the reference documentation
# (http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch05.html#s-notdocbook)
# for more information.
# Please direct all questions, bug reports, or suggestions for changes
# to the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list. For more
# information, see http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/.

Is that not sufficient?

                                        Be seeing you,

If I look at
I see also some others mentions

<!-- Copyright 1992-2006 HaL Computer Systems, Inc.,
     O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., ArborText, Inc., Fujitsu Software
     Corporation, Norman Walsh, Sun Microsystems, Inc., and the
     Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information
     Standards (OASIS).

Almost the same in the Debian package

And also at http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/rng/publishers/publishers.rnc

Couls someone from the legal team confirms it's ok or else what should we at this point?

PS: We did not change anything in the DocBook schema so far

> Question about specific distribution permissions for Docbook files in the Apache OFBiz
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-69
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-69
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato
> The OFBiz project is distributing the following files (xsd and dtd) from the Docbook
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/dtd/
> with this message in the OFBiz LICENSE file (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk/LICENSE)
> ===============
> The docbook schemas in te file docbook.xsd, docbook.dtd xlink.xsd
> and xml.xsd are distributed under the GNU Free Documentation License
> GNU Free Documentation License
> It was allowed by the author to use the docbook files within the 
> Apache OFBiz system in an email to H.Bakker from N.Walsh dd     
> Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:27:51 -0400 (18:27 ICT) 
> ===============
> Is this enough to clear any license issue?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message