www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-64) Artistic License 1.0 licensed "data" in ASF repo as testing resources
Date Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:25:09 GMT
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Stefano Bagnara (JIRA) <jira@apache.org> wrote:
>    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12804966#action_12804966
> Stefano Bagnara commented on LEGAL-64:
> --------------------------------------
> Guys, you always tell that we should not pursue general categorization or generic answers
to licensing issues. Here I was just asking if we can use Artistic License 1.0 licensed "data"
for our jDKIM test suite.


> You talk about "borderline between category A and category B" but I'm not experienced
enough with how that categories maps to "data" (and not source code or binary code). Previosly
you said "Category A but not for Object code or Executables", so I would interpret this as
a YES as the "data" i refer to is mainly composed of "mime messages" (email).
> So unless anyone object I'll take this as a YES.


> Can you also tell me if a "classic" reference in the NOTICE file and appending the Artistic
license to the *source* distribution LICENSE file (tests are not in the binary distributions)
is required/OK/enough/not required.
> Again, unless someone will object I will take that we have to add it to NOTICE (attribution
clause) and to LICENSE (as we do everytime something we ship includes some non apache licensed


- Sam Ruby

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message