www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <hyand...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Question we need to answer to complete Lucene Connector Framework software grant
Date Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:43:22 GMT
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Karl Wright <kwright@metacarta.com> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Karl Wright <kwright@metacarta.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>> It might be interesting to look at what others have done here.  Doesn't
>>>> Google have a Sharepoint connector?  What do they do?
>>>> On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>> We consulted with in-house folks familiar with this problem, and were
>>> able
>>> to confirm that it is the process under which the file was created that
>>> matters.  In this case, they were both created with the same Microsoft
>>> tool,
>>> which explains the similarity.  This should mean our granted version is
>>> ownable by Apache.
>> Is the file the output of using the MS tool?
>> Hen
> The Permissions.wsdl (from SharePoint) seems to be the output of disco.exe.
> The MCPermissionswsdl.aspx is constructed as follows:
> (1) Generate a wsdl using disco.exe
> (2) Turn that into an .aspx file that generates the wsdl, on request to the
> web service.
> So there was hand editing involved in making it be generated by an .aspx,
> but otherwise the answer to your question is "yes".
> The engineer who did this work says that he followed the appropriate
> Microsoft development recommendations for web service development.

What's the input to disco.exe?

i.e. why (for example) does "GetPermissionCollectionResponse" show in
both, instead of MCPermissionswsdl.aspx having


To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message