www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sebb (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-31) NOTICE/LICENSE and third party products
Date Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:07:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-31?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792845#action_12792845
] 

Sebb commented on LEGAL-31:
---------------------------

Surely two ASF products cannot be 3rd party to each other?

Also, I think the LICENSE file needs to be specific about which 3rd party products are present.
It should itemise each product, and point to its license. Referencing a whole directory is
far too vague, IMO.

> NOTICE/LICENSE and third party products
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-31
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-31
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
>
> Legal Affairs still doesn't have consensus about whether the LICENSE/NOTICE for an ASF
release should contain links to (or include) LICENSEs/NOTICEs of 3rd party products included
within the release. In any case the LICENSE for the 3rd party product has to be placed near
the product or appended to the main LICENSE file and for some licenses attribution in the
main NOTICE is madatory.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message