Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39439 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2009 08:23:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2009 08:23:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 95607 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 08:23:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 95339 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 08:23:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 95331 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2009 08:23:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:23:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:23:00 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CD9234C1EF for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:22:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <675612520.1258446159661.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:22:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brett Porter (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-65) storing a patch to an EPL library in the svn repository In-Reply-To: <415226168.1258369659607.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778767#action_12778767 ] Brett Porter commented on LEGAL-65: ----------------------------------- yes, temporary until applied upstream, though it was noted that it may take a Very Long Time for such a thing to occur - so it could be a fairly permanent fixture > storing a patch to an EPL library in the svn repository > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-65 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-65 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: Brett Porter > > The Maven project would like to add a performance testing project that utilises an EPL library, which is possible under the current policies. However, it is required to apply a patch to the EPL library to use in this project. It is not intended to distribute the patched EPL binary, or the EPL sources themselves, but to instruct the user of the project to check out the EPL sources themselves and apply the supplied patch. > Is it acceptable to include the patch file in the Apache svn repository? > [relevant thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200911.mbox/%3cD9933C42-CBBC-4F66-9CA8-79A987BF658A@apache.org%3e] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org