www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
Subject Re: dual licensing
Date Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:44:50 GMT
Oops, sorry this was for OFBiz dev ML

Jacques

From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com>
> Interesting post. This closes the discussion we had some time (years) ago whith Chris
Howe : Dual licensing is not a problem for 
> ASL2 (as long as one licence is compatible)
>
> Also about Selenium IDE, maybe, as Hans did for docbook, we could ask the 2 persons who
are listed here
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-680?focusedCommentId=12470728&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12470728
> if we could use their tools with another ASL2 compatible licence. This would allow us
to embedd Selenium (and the work done by 
> Andrew Sykes)
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Ceki Gulcu <ceki@qos.ch> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am curious about ASF's position on dual licensing. Given the
>>> definitions in [1], if project P is dual licensed under both the EPL
>>> (category B) and LGPL (category C), does the ASF consider P to be
>>> licensed under category B or category C?
>>>
>>> Since any distributor or any end-user can choose between the EPL and
>>> LGPL at any time, including before or after distribution has occurred,
>>> the ASF could consider P to be licensed under EPL (category B) without
>>> prejudice to downstream actors (other than the terms of the EPL).
>>
>> Concrete example: http://docs.jquery.com/License
>>
>> This is made available under a category A license, and it totally
>> acceptable for use by ASF projects.  The fact that it additionally is
>> made available under a different license does not impose any
>> additional restrictions on us.  This would be equally true if the
>> second license were proprietary.
>>
>> The above assumes that we and our downstream users are the Licensees.
>> As licensors, we do not dual license our code.
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message