| bdelacre...@apache.org |
svn commit: r800379 - in /infrastructure/site/trunk/docs: legal/ legal/drafts/ licenses/ licenses/exports/ licenses/proposed/ |
Mon, 03 Aug, 13:41 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-36) CMaps for PDF CJK Fonts |
Tue, 04 Aug, 13:29 |
| Nathan Beyer |
Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Wed, 05 Aug, 01:13 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Wed, 05 Aug, 04:43 |
| Lawrence Rosen |
RE: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Wed, 05 Aug, 15:00 |
| Craig L Russell |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Wed, 05 Aug, 17:43 |
| Jukka Zitting |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Wed, 05 Aug, 17:47 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Wed, 05 Aug, 17:49 |
| Robert Burrell Donkin |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Wed, 05 Aug, 20:26 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Wed, 05 Aug, 21:20 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (LEGAL-55) Adobe Glyph List |
Wed, 05 Aug, 22:37 |
| Nathan Beyer |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Thu, 06 Aug, 01:55 |
| Nathan Beyer |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Thu, 06 Aug, 01:57 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Thu, 06 Aug, 05:23 |
| Niclas Hedhman (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-55) Adobe Glyph List |
Thu, 06 Aug, 05:30 |
| "C. Bergström"C. Bergström" |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Thu, 06 Aug, 05:39 |
| Ralph Goers |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Thu, 06 Aug, 06:05 |
| n...@apache.org |
svn commit: r801598 - in /infrastructure/site/trunk: docs/licenses/exports/index.html xdocs/licenses/exports/index.xml |
Thu, 06 Aug, 10:57 |
| Robert Burrell Donkin |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Fri, 07 Aug, 11:02 |
| Bram Stieperaere |
rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Fri, 07 Aug, 11:36 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Fri, 07 Aug, 16:49 |
| Lawrence Rosen |
RE: rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Fri, 07 Aug, 17:48 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Fri, 07 Aug, 18:43 |
| Doug Cutting |
Re: rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Fri, 07 Aug, 20:07 |
| Henri Yandell |
Re: Should included public domain source code be tagged with ASF headers and be under ALv2 |
Fri, 07 Aug, 20:13 |
| Lawrence Rosen |
RE: rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Fri, 07 Aug, 20:29 |
| Yonik Seeley |
Re: rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Fri, 07 Aug, 20:45 |
| Lawrence Rosen |
RE: rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Fri, 07 Aug, 22:28 |
| Bram Stieperaere |
Re: rewrite of GPL'd C code to java, compatible with Apache Licence? |
Sat, 08 Aug, 09:02 |
| Mladen Turk |
Using icons from tango project |
Sat, 08 Aug, 13:01 |
| Lawrence Rosen |
RE: Using icons from tango project |
Sat, 08 Aug, 15:51 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-25) Create a Licensing Matrix |
Sat, 08 Aug, 18:37 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-6) Is it ok for the Buildr podling to use RJB (LGPL licensed) as an optional dependency? |
Sat, 08 Aug, 18:47 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-7) Is it allowed for a project to ship code that depends on Hibernate (uses its native API) if the code is required to make any use of the project? |
Sat, 08 Aug, 18:47 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-7) Is it allowed for a project to ship code that depends on Hibernate (uses its native API) if the code is required to make any use of the project? |
Sat, 08 Aug, 18:51 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-8) Is it allowed for a project to ship code that depends on Hibernate (uses its native API) if the code is optional, that is, needed in only some applications of the project? |
Sat, 08 Aug, 18:53 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-15) Marshall Schor has asked about a EPL modification use case related to RCP |
Sat, 08 Aug, 19:01 |
| Matthieu Riou (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-6) Is it ok for the Buildr podling to use RJB (LGPL licensed) as an optional dependency? |
Sat, 08 Aug, 19:03 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-24) Scripts, source, and Reciprocal Licenses |
Sat, 08 Aug, 19:24 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-6) Is it ok for the Buildr podling to use RJB (LGPL licensed) as an optional dependency? |
Sat, 08 Aug, 19:32 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-31) NOTICE/LICENSE and third party products |
Sat, 08 Aug, 19:36 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (LEGAL-56) Update the Legal Reports page |
Sat, 08 Aug, 23:48 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (LEGAL-56) Update the Legal Reports page |
Sat, 08 Aug, 23:52 |
| bay...@apache.org |
svn commit: r802475 [1/3] - in /infrastructure/site/trunk: docs/legal/reports.html xdocs/legal/reports.xml |
Sun, 09 Aug, 02:09 |
| bay...@apache.org |
svn commit: r802475 [3/3] - in /infrastructure/site/trunk: docs/legal/reports.html xdocs/legal/reports.xml |
Sun, 09 Aug, 02:09 |
| bay...@apache.org |
svn commit: r802475 [2/3] - in /infrastructure/site/trunk: docs/legal/reports.html xdocs/legal/reports.xml |
Sun, 09 Aug, 02:09 |
| Henri Yandell (JIRA) |
[jira] Closed: (LEGAL-56) Update the Legal Reports page |
Sun, 09 Aug, 02:10 |
| Jeremias Maerki (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-55) Adobe Glyph List |
Sun, 09 Aug, 11:52 |
| Václav Haisman |
Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Sun, 09 Aug, 13:34 |
| Jason Davies |
Third-party Licenses |
Sun, 09 Aug, 17:52 |
| Jason Davies |
Third-party licenses |
Sun, 09 Aug, 17:52 |
| Ralph Goers |
Re: Third-party licenses |
Mon, 10 Aug, 02:53 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 02:55 |
| Geir Magnusson Jr. |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 03:02 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 04:35 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Third-party licenses |
Mon, 10 Aug, 04:37 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (LEGAL-15) Marshall Schor has asked about a EPL modification use case related to RCP |
Mon, 10 Aug, 10:03 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-36) CMaps for PDF CJK Fonts |
Mon, 10 Aug, 10:21 |
| Jukka Zitting (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-55) Adobe Glyph List |
Mon, 10 Aug, 10:25 |
| Jukka Zitting |
Resolving LEGAL-36 and LEGAL-55 |
Mon, 10 Aug, 10:30 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 10:30 |
| Jason Davies |
Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements? |
Mon, 10 Aug, 12:21 |
| Robert Burrell Donkin |
Re: Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements? |
Mon, 10 Aug, 12:46 |
| rdon...@apache.org |
svn commit: r802770 - in /infrastructure/site/trunk: docs/legal/resolved.html xdocs/legal/resolved.xml |
Mon, 10 Aug, 12:51 |
| Robert Burrell Donkin |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 13:07 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 13:51 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 14:36 |
| Ralph Goers |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 14:40 |
| Ralph Goers |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 14:47 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 15:47 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements? |
Mon, 10 Aug, 16:15 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 16:30 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 17:21 |
| Robert Burrell Donkin |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 19:45 |
| Robert Burrell Donkin |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Mon, 10 Aug, 19:47 |
| Ralph Goers |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 01:29 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 02:06 |
| Ralph Goers |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 03:08 |
| Jason Davies |
Re: Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements? |
Tue, 11 Aug, 08:05 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements? |
Tue, 11 Aug, 08:11 |
| Jason Davies |
Re: Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements? |
Tue, 11 Aug, 08:13 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements? |
Tue, 11 Aug, 08:54 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 09:24 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 09:35 |
| Robert Burrell Donkin |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 10:59 |
| Václav Haisman |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 11:08 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
In a different universe [WAS: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0.] |
Tue, 11 Aug, 11:34 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 11:49 |
| Robert Burrell Donkin |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 12:17 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 14:51 |
| Doug Cutting |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 16:34 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 16:42 |
| Ceki Gulcu |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 17:02 |
| Václav Haisman (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (LEGAL-57) Re-licensing of log4cplus under ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 17:07 |
| Doug Cutting |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Tue, 11 Aug, 17:28 |
| Matthieu Riou (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-6) Is it ok for the Buildr podling to use RJB (LGPL licensed) as an optional dependency? |
Wed, 12 Aug, 00:26 |
| J Aaron Farr |
Re: Third-party licenses |
Wed, 12 Aug, 11:28 |
| J Aaron Farr |
Re: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0. |
Wed, 12 Aug, 11:48 |
| Henri Yandell |
Re: In a different universe [WAS: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0.] |
Thu, 13 Aug, 02:28 |
| Niclas Hedhman |
Re: In a different universe [WAS: Move log4cplus' license to ASL 2.0.] |
Thu, 13 Aug, 05:08 |