www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthieu Riou (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-6) Is it ok for the Buildr podling to use RJB (LGPL licensed) as an optional dependency?
Date Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:03:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12740944#action_12740944
] 

Matthieu Riou commented on LEGAL-6:
-----------------------------------

I guess the lazy consensus is that the use case outlined above is okay. At least that's the
assumption we've been operating on. It's very similar to distributing Java software that needs
a JDK to run.

> Is it ok for the Buildr podling to use RJB (LGPL licensed) as an optional dependency?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-6
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-6
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Matthieu Riou
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message