www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-24) Scripts, source, and Reciprocal Licenses
Date Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:46:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732832#action_12732832
] 

Henri Yandell commented on LEGAL-24:
------------------------------------

Sam said:

"Not sure where that text goes, but I support the idea.

I'd suggest leaving the text requesting a "prominent label".  I'd also
suggest that the requirement for object/binary form shouldn't
completely go away, merely that it be demoted to a suggestion, and
"where possible/appropriate" or somesuch be added."

> Scripts, source, and Reciprocal Licenses
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-24
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-24
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Sam Ruby
>
> The current draft of the Third Party Licensing Policy (0.53) contains the following text
under the section concerning Reciprocal Licenses:
> Note that works written in a scripting language without a binary form cannot be included
in any ASF product under one of these licenses (see Transition and Exceptions).
> We need to decide if this truly is necessary.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message