www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <uthaiyashan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Including generated documents (pdf) in release pack - Apache Stonehenge
Date Fri, 15 May 2009 12:43:05 GMT
Hi,



>> We are working on the first(M1) release of Apache Stonehenge
>> (incubator) Project. We have included some pdf documents in the
>> release artifact [1] (source pack as well as binary pack), which are
>> generated from wiki pages [2]. Is it ok to include them in the release
>> artifact (specially, in source artifacts)? (Since these documents are
>> not in svn, it was suggested better to check with legal-discuss [3]).
>>
>> If it is ok to include, do we need any licencing information included?
>
> AFAIK, it is Ok to put generated files in the source releases, and I
> don't think you need any extra licensing information for the PDF, but
> should probably mention trademarks and logos are not Apache licensed,
> and any downstream use of those would need to get clearance from the
> PRC.

Where should we mention it? In the README file?

Also, what do you mean by "trademarks and logos" in the pdf document?

Regards,
Shankar


>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
>
> I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message