www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-49) Status of LGPL v3 as an ASF project dependency
Date Fri, 08 May 2009 03:51:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12707224#action_12707224

Henri Yandell commented on LEGAL-49:

It'll obviously never be Category A. So the question is whether our concerns with LGPL are
resolved in version 3 to allow us to consider it category B. I'll bring it up on list as there's
been discussion but not a categorical answer (pardon my pun :) ).

> Status of LGPL v3 as an ASF project dependency
> ----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-49
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-49
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Sebb
> JMeter bug 47166 suggests adding Adobe BlazeDs as a compile/runtime dependency:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
> According to http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/blazeds/License the software is
licensed under GNU Lesser General Public License Version 3.
> The Third-Party Licensing Policy at http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html mentions
LGPL v2.1 but does not mention LGPL v3
> Does LGPL v3 have the same restrictions for use in ASF projects?
> Or are the restrictions on it more - or less - strict?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message