www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Licensing pertaining to what's in SVN vs. what's in distributions
Date Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:37:32 GMT
Regarding just the dependency issue, are you compliant with
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html ??

On Apr 16, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:

> Our project would contains some code (< 1%) that cannot be released
> under the Apache License, so in our "dist" build target, we strip out
> that portion of our codebase and produce a source distribution without
> the offending code.
>
> My question is: is this an OK practice, or does our subversion
> repository need to contain only things that we are allowed to
> distribute?  I'd prefer the former, because otherwise, we'll have to
> have a sister-repository on something like Google Code, which just
> complicates our build process a little.
>
> We are currently voting on a release, and the answer to this question
> is very relevant, so a prompt reply would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
> -T
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message