Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96490 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 15:59:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 15:59:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 74796 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 15:59:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 74592 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 15:59:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 74583 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 15:59:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:59:42 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates 209.85.162.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.162.178] (HELO el-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.162.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:59:33 +0000 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n30so1281218elf.23 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:59:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W4DRmLOiG0g7FwZ9yLsLZvT7wojo65GOc68TnPanSfQ=; b=sN1vgFE0qogC9wMPN5tvlYdYRwwr6SwJt0WjoMvOw0wSPQ/45DH3mvszCPVS/sT3LB MGCo6IzcORUhSpYB+4sLEh/uiHt2QrJrLEBjrr36U2M74O47oumvVEajOT314UqSlqXs 6TcJByLnmi7im9vxCAsNxuT85gpbybA7GXztw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ITuzeItV4GbdsoGDEdKnUFhQr9yNE09NjMjtV9vNjZfCEOhJZlai8h6+iibTe7GSz6 Y7zibvoZ43rnsRssoWNR89kh/U6eR/HGEhcpex5fz2OIdtbBdUS9FdQ41V9LtagJTn0D aLOCcMudyraF3Wfq5W8k4MlwXKx4/tEZni8SA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.155.5 with SMTP id h5mr2422669ybo.189.1235491152323; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:59:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:59:12 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 16b5c0af057d4601 Message-ID: <3d4032300902240759r1d433c9bv9434e118cca41c68@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Permission to use Contributor License Agreement form From: Sam Ruby To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Saifi Khan wrote: > Hi: > > I write this mail to seek permission to use and adapt the > Apache individual contributor license agreement form for our > projects. > > The said form in question is at > http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt > > Appreciate a response. First the obvious: names, addresses, and phone numbers would need to change. Beyond that, reuse of documents such as these are something I believe that we should (and, in fact have) encourage/encouraged. Now, how best to accomplish that. For starters, do we require attribution? In this specific case while it would be welcome, I don't think it should be required. What do others think? > thanks > Saifi. > > Twincling Technology Foundation is India's first independent, > "not for profit" Open Source software promotion and development > foundation. Open Source ! > > http://www.twincling.org/ - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org