Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Cc: legal-discuss@apache.org
Message-Id: <0386779E-6707-4F38-9FE8-538EC8191AE7@toolazydogs.com>
From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <list@toolazydogs.com>
To: jsecurity-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <44b57a610901111127o8f75677uc466945a5323f4bc@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Change JSecurity's Name
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:20:07 -0800
References: <BF4134FD-E310-4767-AF50-69910B01B575@toolazydogs.com>
 <4B5E628F-E714-4C58-B442-5D7386DD27D1@SUN.com>
 <2d12b2f00901021441o381e3288sdb7027561435f6aa@mail.gmail.com>
 <F2A801FB-4FE5-4CD2-942D-805E7BA143AC@SUN.com>
 <44b57a610901101700h655e5f0di76eeb1d56c26377f@mail.gmail.com>
 <46A10641-800C-4C8E-94D2-45C6A822CF55@pobox.com>
 <9D3151A0-4F2E-43DD-987C-F74EEE0D224C@toolazydogs.com>
 <E81B7E41-0087-4AC1-A922-AE12D149E56A@gmail.com>
 <496A428E.7030208@apache.org>
 <FAE2E0CB-44B2-4CD7-AD1D-E1EF503FF764@gmail.com>
 <44b57a610901111127o8f75677uc466945a5323f4bc@mail.gmail.com>

I think there's a lot of foot work that needs to be done to just get =20
us to find the right person.  Find that person and I'll be happy to =20
start the discussion.  I imagine that something might have to be hand =20=

held through the lawyers if we're lucky.


Regards,
Alan

On Jan 11, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

> Great idea.  But would this be something that one of the folks in
> legal@ would want to formulate?  Or should it be one of us 'regular
> joes' just asking a question?  I've cc'd Legal to see what they
> recommend....
>
> Cheers,
>
> Les
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Tim Veil <tjveil@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Its not a bad idea.  It could be one of those things that they are =20=

>> unlikely
>> to care about unless specifically asked to care, but it would =20
>> certainly put
>> an end to the discussion.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Emmanuel L=E9charny wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Veil wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I guess my take is that
>>>> JSecurity has been in the name of this project for nearly 4 years =20=

>>>> without
>>>> compliant
>>>> JSecurity has name recognition and a following
>>>> The project of concern, "J-Security" is not a product at all but =20=

>>>> rather a
>>>> " resource for security information and analysis."
>>>> J-Security's parent company Juniper is in the network hardware =20
>>>> business
>>>> not the Java application business
>>>> JSecurity is an open-source software project not a "product" we are
>>>> looking to sell (not a competitor in any way to Juniper)
>>>
>>> Just a suggestion : why don't someone contact Juniper legals and =20
>>> ask if
>>> they see JSecurity as an acceptable name for us ? That would close =20=

>>> this long
>>> thread, I think.
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> cordialement, regards,
>>> Emmanuel L=E9charny
>>> www.iktek.com
>>> directory.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org