Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66882 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2008 21:10:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2008 21:10:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 7026 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2008 21:10:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 6772 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2008 21:10:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 6763 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2008 21:10:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:10:45 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.188.213.8] (HELO smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk) (195.188.213.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:09:16 +0000 Received: from [172.23.170.137] (helo=anti-virus01-08) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1L7cVN-0000lY-9j for legal-discuss@apache.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:10:01 +0000 Received: from [94.168.198.57] (helo=[10.0.0.27]) by asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1L7cVJ-0005QT-Vh for legal-discuss@apache.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:09:58 +0000 Subject: Re: Requesting a license to commercial software for testing From: Robert Burrell Donkin To: legal-discuss@apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8Jgg5aq9XN/X/q/zIP2g" Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:09:57 +0000 Message-Id: <1228252197.7794.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=-8Jgg5aq9XN/X/q/zIP2g Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 15:21 -0500, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am a committer on the apache struts project. Lately, we have been > having problems with the IBM WebSphere application server. WebSphere > has a community edition (open source), but it is based on open source > application servers (Geronimo, Tomcat / Jetty). I am wondering if I > can request a license for WebSphere from them for myself (and the > struts team) to use for integration testing. I have the hardware and > bandwidth to do it, but I don't want to cause problems by requesting > something on behalf of an Apache project. WebSphere is quite common, > and Struts is quite common as well, so if I can get in contact with > the right people there, I think they will see the value in allowing us > to test with their software. ok > My question is whether or not this presents any legal problems... Do I > need to specifically request that the license be granted to the ASF? IMHO apache doesn't really want or need a commercial WebSphere license > If the software is licensed to the ASF, do I need to install and run > the software on ASF hardware? If I want to forgo the formalities and > ask for the software for myself, will that get me in trouble? my advice is to approach the (right) WebSphere people with your problem ("I'm a struts committer and I need to do WebSphere integration testing for reasons XYZ") and let them suggest a solution. they might be able to find you an account on one of their servers, grant you a developer license (IIRC i was issued one of these a few years ago to debug an WebSphere issue with one of the apache libraries i worked on), suggest that apache is granted some sort of non-commercial license, or whatever. if it's something that requires official involvement then come back with their proposal - robert --=-8Jgg5aq9XN/X/q/zIP2g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkk1pCAACgkQQ617goCdfgNjkACgv1udO610zyxY2av/f5P3DbOl tGkAmQHo0daVolv9gAozmuZGdjJ7VlNj =ru2c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8Jgg5aq9XN/X/q/zIP2g--