Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90004 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2008 21:34:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2008 21:34:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 34540 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2008 21:34:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 34290 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2008 21:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 34281 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2008 21:34:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:34:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.134.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.134.187] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:32:44 +0000 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w1so106539mue.9 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:33:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qnjvsVX9t6qOeBfk0vwvih+z+MTrcXjQYrVgGwsfDFo=; b=sGQifi/OMZ5zSCOYFoBrQbgnScjwAczmWQRDB1EnwP8dnhZsZyhVV6dQoKRA3zz4yf 4+MhhPEn0+X2g/Ezo0F0JRzDz43O7cldqnwA2j9FvZpv3YI49IJwuxe+Wkq/dOnNBsL1 TQiTLO0lPWOd0ewnQ8KSWai0BLumlicoe9wNw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=pqQbUn6tlGLGXxbNcYTlpwSLTavbBrsHVRVQCcGLdoKZxS3ATUn7bHBjpgBOKVWncu JnynVKp9juW+6sWnlqrIXsrKiIJXA7BFLQuOKUE4csm2bt197+ZAV+rLq9tN1kWId5gu PWFNgVdCJjNQNu8acEWPDvhaEbOtnkCWJdGW8= Received: by 10.181.134.11 with SMTP id l11mr1699006bkn.18.1227648809442; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:33:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.56.16 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:33:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <61b5d9410811251333p347d2a49mcba9c6a0e505c92@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:33:29 -0500 From: "Benson Margulies" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: How do things get resolved In-Reply-To: <2d12b2f00811251247p16d2086fuf6fef06893a19241@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <61b5d9410811231248j6fa64164xf1d42e1d02d6e656@mail.gmail.com> <2d12b2f00811251247p16d2086fuf6fef06893a19241@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm sorry to be a bit dense. Should I go ahead and open a JIRA to get an up-or-down resolution on just checking it where I can check it in, or does your proposal for a Coventry in svn take precedence? On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > How do things get resolved? - Opening a JIRA issue is a good way to > force the resolution step, questions on the list tend to be more > consultation than permission by the nature of the forum. > > I've replied on the other thread. For this thread, using JIRA was our > mechanism for driving resolution and it might be that we need to start > moving to a "Post that in JIRA" response to non-easy questions. > > Hen > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> Please forgive a committer on his first visit to legal-discuss. >> >> A few days ago I posted a question about the svn-ability of test cases >> from the W3C with a messy license. That attracted two responses. >> >> Were I to be an optimist, I could construct an interpretation of those >> answers as follows: >> >> So long as (a) they are just test cases that we don't ever need or >> want to modify, and (b) we check them in to their very own directory, >> and (c) don't incorporate them in any sort of build results, they can >> be checked in. >> >> However, I'm not an optimist, and more to the point I don't know the >> rules. Is there some legal-discuss analog to a vote? Or does this list >> just exist to give advice to committers and in the event that push >> comes to shove there's some other process for getting a formal answer >> to a question. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational >> only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not >> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions >> and policies of the ASF. See for >> official ASF policies and documents. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational > only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions > and policies of the ASF. See for > official ASF policies and documents. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org