Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49345 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2008 09:29:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2008 09:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 67055 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2008 09:29:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 66790 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2008 09:29:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 66781 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2008 09:29:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:29:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hyandell@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.179] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:28:25 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1012426wah.17 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:29:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=lkd0e9tifZ9YmTI2cUHBKWUKM4+luMwSfrSqBOfbyX0=; b=XbIow7/D7eJG6TsE6vHay8FFwgZRix08hw8RAAqZ8aHuhZOkkmo7EcijIu3QvWFo9d 4E0nDGgW03+9aTaHmtqME4P2umcSUKhRacUc8g7dpQv0QDO9JQ5mBdiD2/l0136tW+b8 8Jf9qAVCGh53vFkrR3QDYOPEyN/tRj7lTL4+Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=n+1Ui5p/gTHzk7vvOPh+z6/jNsA8pVfz6E5SdG5t76WPj9RDxBRrLKKgYI+L6hTjwi wmd1QmCBtH4HqMZsrHZ71U8qycgOsNSQMuXfScqCC16zYkaG2J/05cFh/6B3XP8EQYBh BQuMPUf7OgYRhyvcp6EUL8QfXIqv5Iaoc4yXY= Received: by 10.114.125.15 with SMTP id x15mr5659906wac.42.1228037343014; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.159.2 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:29:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d12b2f00811300129p3792fc66y586b046cbe355f87@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:29:02 -0800 From: "Henri Yandell" Sender: hyandell@gmail.com To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (LEGAL-41) Is the ERLANG PUBLIC LICENSE ok as a Category B binary dependency? In-Reply-To: <349193499.1227889304198.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <349193499.1227889304198.JavaMail.jira@brutus> X-Google-Sender-Auth: b8176a278388bbd2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Looks fine to me - MPL 1.0 clone and in a eyeballed diff there is nothing novel added. A note for the list that I plan to add this to the Category B list unless I hear otherwise in the next couple of days. Hen On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:21 AM, ant elder (JIRA) wrote: > Is the ERLANG PUBLIC LICENSE ok as a Category B binary dependency? > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LEGAL-41 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-41 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: ant elder > > > Tuscany wants to have an Erlang extension which would have a binary dependency on the Erlang Java Interface which uses the Erlang Public License, is this ok? > > http://www.erlang.org/EPLICENSE > http://apache.markmail.org/message/6yuefuf2h4mpc3tq > > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational > only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions > and policies of the ASF. See for > official ASF policies and documents. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org