www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roland Weber <ossf...@dubioso.net>
Subject Re: [Fwd: Please review Oracle's proposed revised JSR301 draft license]
Date Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:08:41 GMT
>> (iii) includes the following notice:
>> "This is an implementation of an early draft specification the JSR 301
>> public review draft specification developed under the Java Community Process
>> (JCP) and is made available for testing and evaluation purposes only. This
>> implementation may not fully conform to this specification.  This
>> implementation may differ from the final specification.  The code is not
>> compatible with any specification of the JCP."

The last sentence sounds like a technical statement that can be wrong.
If there are no changes between the last draft and the final spec,
then the code _is_ compatible with the specification once that is
finalized. It is just impossible to tell in advance.
Also the "any" covers more than just JSR 301. JSR 301 refers to
JSR 168 and JSR 286. So the code could be compatible with other JSRs.

"The code is not known to be compatible with..."?

cheers,
  Roland



---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message