www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Roy T. Fielding (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-41) Is the ERLANG PUBLIC LICENSE ok as a Category B binary dependency?
Date Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:29:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651863#action_12651863
] 

Roy T. Fielding commented on LEGAL-41:
--------------------------------------

I think you mean MPL 1.1.  Yes, it is fine.

> Is the ERLANG PUBLIC LICENSE ok as a Category B binary dependency?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-41
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-41
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: ant elder
>
> Tuscany wants to have an Erlang extension which would have a binary dependency on the
Erlang Java Interface which uses the Erlang Public License, is this ok? 
> http://www.erlang.org/EPLICENSE
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/6yuefuf2h4mpc3tq

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message