Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93496 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2008 13:12:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2008 13:12:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 7351 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2008 13:12:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 6545 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2008 13:12:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 6525 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2008 13:12:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:12:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jim@jagunet.com designates 209.133.199.10 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:11:04 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jaguNET.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDB23FB29D2; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:11:12 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Legal Discuss , private@spamassassin.apache.org Message-Id: <7B606F94-F9E5-4908-952D-D5E94DE493F3@jaguNET.com> From: Jim Jagielski To: board@apache.org In-Reply-To: <48FA790C.7020008@dostech.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: Registering the SpamAssassin trademark - Funds Needed Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:11:11 -0400 References: <48FA790C.7020008@dostech.ca> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org To be clear, I think this is a smart move, both with my board and my PRC hat on, so I +1. On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:02 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Hi Board -- > > The SpamAssassin PMC is looking to have our currently filed "intent > for > use" trademarks filed as "actual use" trademarks... or something like > that. Larry Rosen has volunteered to do the work. We just need to > come > up with the USPTO fees which Larry estimates to be around $600. Sam > and > Jim suggested that the board may approve this via a 72 hour lazy > consensus since it's such a small amount. > > Emails regarding this are included below. There's a small amount more > in the same thread on the legal-discuss list. > > Please ACK or NACK this so I know either way... I don't think my sub > to > the board@ list ever got approved so this may not get through for a > while, if at all. > > Thanks, > > Daryl > > (on behalf of the SpamAssassin PMC) > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Registering the SpamAssassin trademark > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:07:29 -0400 > From: Jim Jagielski > Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org > To: legal-discuss@apache.org > References: <48BDE194.1000501@dostech.ca> > <3d4032300809081415o3ab1170cn611e585ff7d21882@mail.gmail.com> > > > On Sep 8, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea >> wrote: >>> >>> My questions... is this something the ASF would like to have happen >>> and >>> how can we go about making it happen? >> >> To bring this to closure, here's my suggestion. >> >> If the PRC and the SpamAssassin PMCs agree that this should be done, >> Larry has already graciously volunteered to file the necessary >> paperwork. The funding needs approved, and as there isn't a >> pre-existing budget item for this, that requires board action. Given >> the small amount in question, I would think that a quick note to >> board@ and a 72-hour period of lazy consensus would suffice, but I'll >> leave that up to Jim to decide. Once that's done, I will work with >> Larry (who is doing the work) and J Aaron (ASF Treasurer) to see to >> it >> that the payments are made. >> > > +1 > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: Registering the SpamAssassin trademark > Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:12:36 -0700 > From: Lawrence Rosen > Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org, > Organization: Rosenlaw & Einschlag > To: > CC: 'Sam Ruby' > References: <48BDE194.1000501@dostech.ca> > <3d4032300809021903l6aaea476j1b898c40f6beb786@mail.gmail.com> > <2B0725F9-9D5A-4CB3-B72B-BB239BCCFF81@jaguNET.com> > <3d4032300809030743u1c9e1b72r86bdaf9fb8c2b97f@mail.gmail.com> > <012201c90e06$74208250$6701a8c0@LROSENTOSHIBA> <48FA4DDB.7000801@dostech.ca > > > > Daryl, > > If we file new applications, it will cost about $600 in PTO fees. If I > merely amend the current ones, I'm not sure, but less. As I recall, > the > board has already approved this expenditure. > > I haven't yet charged Apache for any of my time helping here. I only > ask > that you take a collection to bail me out of the poorhouse when I > get sent > there for failure to pay my mortgage. > > The thing I'm waiting on is a copy of (Robyn's?) files so I can tell > what > happened in the past. Then I'll pursue the PTO amendments. > > /Larry > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:spamassassin@dostech.ca] >> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 1:58 PM >> To: legal-discuss@apache.org >> Subject: Re: Registering the SpamAssassin trademark >> >> Larry, >> >> On 03/09/2008 4:48 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: >>> Sam Ruby wrote: >>>> Looks that way: >>>> >>>> http://assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/q?db=tm&sno=78148991 >>>> http://assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/q?db=tm&sno=78213077 >>> >>> It appears that these were filed as "Intent to Use" rather than >>> "Actual >>> Use". Notice of Allowance was mailed, presumably to Robyn, earlier >>> this >>> year. She/we will need to follow up with appropriate statements of >>> use >> to >>> finalize those registrations. >>> >>> http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=78148991 >>> http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=78213077 >>> >>> This is turning out to be even cheaper than I first estimated. :-) >> >> Would you have an idea of the total cost that might be involved, >> including any future responses to the USPTO? If not, could someone >> put >> me in touch with Robyn so that I can obtain an estimate from her? >> I'd >> like to have an idea of the total costs involved before asking the >> board >> for funding approval. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daryl >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and >> educational >> only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not >> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions >> and policies of the ASF. See for >> official ASF policies and documents. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational > only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions > and policies of the ASF. See for > official ASF policies and documents. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org