Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37523 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2008 15:18:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2008 15:18:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 9123 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2008 15:18:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 8922 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2008 15:18:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 8913 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2008 15:18:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:18:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [89.16.172.240] (HELO bytesexual.org) (89.16.172.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:17:59 +0000 Received: from nslater by bytesexual.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KY0JQ-00044d-8L for legal-discuss@apache.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:18:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:18:28 +0100 From: Noah Slater To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: [sgala@apache.org: Re: aesthetic changes to the NOTICE file] Message-ID: <20080826151828.GN17954@bytesexual.org> Mail-Followup-To: legal-discuss@apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Noah: Awesome User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, Please see the following thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200808.mbox/%3c20080818110801.GD22326@bytesexual.org%3e I agree with the comments that before any change could take place this should be agreed on by legal-discuss or a change be made in the official documentation. Regarding the following text: Apache [PRODUCT_NAME] Copyright [yyyy] The Apache Software Foundation This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). - Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy, http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice My questions would be: * Does the non-textual formatting of this matter? * Would the following be an okay variation, or modification to the documentation: Apache [PRODUCT NAME] NOTICE ============================ Copyright 2008, The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/) This is clearly a very trivial matter, and one primarily about aesthetics, but I think a clarification would be nice as I certainly prefer the latter format. Many thanks, ----- Forwarded message from Santiago Gala ----- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:51:20 +0200 From: Santiago Gala Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: aesthetic changes to the NOTICE file On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:59:43PM +0100, ant elder wrote: >> I'd be wary of doing that if i was you. Whether or not it means the same >> thing legally this is clearly specified in ASF policy at >> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice and if you change from >> that you may find some other stickler delaying or blocking one of you >> release votes due to any differences. > > Gah, well I thought as much. IANAL but it looks okay to me. :) > You might ask to the legal team, as I'm not sure of the rationale of the sentence that you missed in the NOTICE file and how much "required" it is. The part of src-headers we are referring to was committed by Cliff Schmith, then Legal VP, on Jul 17, 2006, r422600 and this part of it has never been changed since then. In my opinion, stating that the product includes software developed at the ASF is probably redundant, given the LICENSE file that governs the collective work. I guess it is there so that the remaining "portions" make sense together with a given "whole". In any case, as it is current policy, it should be followed, and changes to it discussed in legal-discuss. Regards Santiago > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Noah Slater, http://people.apache.org/~nslater/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org