www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell" <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Do README files need Apache license headers?
Date Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:53:37 GMT
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Anything that has intellectual property content must have the Apache
>> license header.
> I don't think we need to be so absolute.  The primary purpose of the
> header is documentation of the fact that the original content within
> the file has been licensed for redistribution, cut-n-paste, etc.
> I often just include a description of the license within the README,
> which serves the same purpose but is talking about the license that
> applies to the package as a whole (including the README).

+1. If we put a license header on every item then it gets silly.

So what can be covered by the package's license?

I think yes to the following:

* Javadoc/Doxygen type generated content
* examples

How about these:

* build files?
* configuration?


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message