www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Oleg Kalnichevski (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-34) Release VOTE and svn tag, source package, binary package
Date Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:52:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-34?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12624361#action_12624361
] 

Oleg Kalnichevski commented on LEGAL-34:
----------------------------------------

There is also a variation on the release process B (which seems quite common): 
A format vote is held on releasing src and bin distributions. Maven artifacts are considered
byproducts that do not require to be voted on as long as they are identical to those contained
in the src / bin distributions.

Oleg

> Release VOTE and svn tag, source package, binary package
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-34
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-34
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
>
> I saw various practices in the ASF about the release vote.
> A. Some PMC vote svn tags and then a release is made and then the src and binary packages
generated are not voted before publishing.
> B. Some PMC vote on a source package created from the svn tag and then any other binary
package created from that source is published without a vote.
> C. Some PMC vote all of the published content.
> Is there any ASF policy we should be aware before each PMC can decide how to deal with
release vote?
> Here is what I found in ASF pages.
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> ---
> The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases are in the
form of the source materials needed to make changes to the software being released. In some
cases, binary/bytecode packages are also produced as a convenience to users that might not
have the appropriate tools to build a compiled version of the source. In all such cases, the
binary/bytecode package must have the same version number as the source release and may only
add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code
release.
> --- 
> Sub-issue: is it ok for a project to publish on www.apache.org/dist an installer created
by one contributor based on the released sources and using a commercial installer tool ? Does
this require a VOTE ?
> http://markmail.org/message/5agseuhdoyu3fh2x

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message