www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sam Ruby" <ru...@intertwingly.net>
Subject Re: Licenses are not always what they seem [was: RE: GPL licensing question ...]
Date Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:56:59 GMT
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Mon, 7/28/08, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> I'm not exactly clear how Xen got introduced into this conversation,
>> but it makes a great example.  The FSF has made both GPL
>> and LGPL licenses available, the key difference being how they treat
>> other applications which make use of the interfaces provided.
>> For us to treat statements on a wiki (on a wiki!) that ascribe the
>> behavior of the LGPL to the GPL as somehow being more authoritative
>> than what the license itself may say boggles the mind.
> Fortunately nobody's suggesting that.  What I am suggesting when it
> comes to Xen is not to read the FAQ, but to get specific about which
> interfaces are actually required.  Because as I've said many times now,
> the license under discussion will depend on which interface people
> want to use.  It's not all GPL by any stretch, and being the copyright
> holders they *can* provide LGPL'd (or BSD'd) interfaces to GPL'd code.

Cool.  If they provide an interface under a license listed on
<http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html> as "considered to be
similar in terms", there is no need to check back here.  If the
license differs, lets discuss, and we will see what we can do.

- Sam Ruby

DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message