Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hyandell@gmail.com designates
 209.85.198.228 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=Yu2Cy0cFCv5Ogp8lAJ2x2J4nUnXf4AyUyitunsD+6BDMgWzffv3rWUE7LlOJA2WBv4
         K7LKGvGE83l5Z0+zPBmpMFJ/WyWvKmZ/0Qw7SvOfzSErf5hUHhXIrpe4IrUemS/G9epn
         3ZhgxjanQVbN8S7uno5dy5PKrsVLFziWnb5yU=
Message-ID: <2d12b2f00806192210g77e3f93fjc13f3de98492509f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:10:32 -0700
From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org>
Sender: hyandell@gmail.com
To: "ASF Legal Discuss" <legal-discuss@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Inserting OSGi manifests into 3rd party jars
In-Reply-To: <2d12b2f00806172216p20fe953dtf1d44090f59776b1@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <2d12b2f00806172216p20fe953dtf1d44090f59776b1@mail.gmail.com>

Any last comments before I add this tomorrow night?

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
> In http://markmail.org/message/y55i335inlcvclyb#query:+page:1+mid:nrixig5jr65xgtr4+state:results
> - I suggested the following:
>
> "Insertion of OSGi metadata into CDDL licensed jars is permitted; even
> though that metadata becomes CDDL licensed when it is put in the jar"
>
> Before adding that to resolved.html, I'd like to expand it to be:
>
> "Qn: Can OSGi metadata be added to weak copyleft binaries - thus
> modifying the binary jar file?"
>
> "Ans: Insertion of OSGi metadata into 'Category B' licensed jars is
> permitted; even though that metadata becomes licensed under the 3rd
> party license when it is put in the jar.  "
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Things I ruled out:
>
> 1) Making it a part of the Category B section. I think we'll just have
> to ensure that the question is checked when a new Category B license
> is added.
> 2) Stating the obvious that it's fine to add to Category A licensed works.
>
> Hen
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org