www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell" <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: JSON license
Date Thu, 12 Jun 2008 06:37:18 GMT
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: JSON license
To: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>


On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Our (the incubating Sling project) specific use case is to include a
>> slightly modified version of the sources of the JSON Java library
>> (http://www.json.org/java/) in our release.
>
> The consensus seems to be that the "Good, not Evil" condition does not
> prevent us from using the code. Unless anyone objects, I will assume
> lazy consensus on this and let the related Sling release vote
> continue.
>
> More generally, should the JSON license be classified as a category B
> license based on Sam's reasoning?

Rather we should add something like the following to the resolved page:

Qn: "Can Apache products include works licensed under the JSON license?"

An: "The JSON Java library may be included. Please contact
legal-discuss@ for other products under this license. "

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message