www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthieu Riou (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-6) Is it ok for the Buildr podling to use RJB (LGPL licensed) as an optional dependency?
Date Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:26:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603888#action_12603888
] 

Matthieu Riou commented on LEGAL-6:
-----------------------------------

An important remark is that Buildr being a Ruby project, dependencies are RubyGems. Which
means that they're never shpped as part of the normal distribution and the installation of
dependencies can be declined.

> Is it ok for the Buildr podling to use RJB (LGPL licensed) as an optional dependency?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-6
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-6
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Matthieu Riou
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message