www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sam Ruby" <ru...@intertwingly.net>
Subject Re: AL's patent license in the context of derivative works
Date Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:09:18 GMT
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >  3) the rights of downstream users are generally claimed to be virtually
>  > unlimited due to the mantra of "patent exhaustion", a suspect claim since
>  > Larry even told us to "not go there"
>  >
>  > Patent Exhaustion is a shorthand way of saying what Larry said, namely
>  > "Patent claims that were licensed to ASF under the CLA for the
>  > original project go with that contribution and can be practiced by
>  > anyone in licensed derivative works. ASF can practice those claims in
>  > any of its projects."

It was pointed out to me off-list that the above statement( "... is a
shorthand ...") is not true.

- Sam Ruby

DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message