Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16797 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2008 05:33:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2008 05:33:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 90670 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2008 05:32:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 90348 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2008 05:32:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 90336 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2008 05:32:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:32:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OIMO,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.112.202.2] (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:32:21 +0000 Received: from localhost. ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.1-dev) with SMTP ID 275; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:32:30 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: "sebb" , "Sam Ruby" Cc: "Joe Schaefer" , Subject: RE: fair use (was Re: What licenses in category X satisfy criterion #2?) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:32:27 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 In-Reply-To: <25aac9fc0803050805w14532149kf9438233d7d4e17c@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org sebb wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote: > > Our code having dependencies that would be incompatible with any or > > all such uses effectively defeats the purpose behind us selecting such > > a liberal license. > When the pages that describe the rules are updated, IMO it would be > very helpful to have such a "statement of intent" as part of the > introduction/overview. +1 --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org