www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: fair use (was Re: What licenses in category X satisfy criterion #2?)
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:28:17 GMT
--- Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Joe Schaefer
> <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >  --- Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> >
> >  Copyright law concerns tangible expressions of
> >  authorship.  Software which compiles things "on
> >  the fly" then would impact the licensing on the
> >  runtime (executable), not on the tarball we
> >  distribute.
> >
> >  It is my position that until the policy addresses
> >  the two questions I have asked as separate
> >  issues, we will continue to chase our tail here.
> That's a fair observation.  And I will add that I
> had momentarily forgotten that you were talking
> about point #1.  What may or may not
> be needed at runtime is a point #2 issue, as you
> have defined it.

Right.  What I'm hoping is that by the time we have
separated these two concerns, we'll realize that 
creating a policy around point #2 is absurd, and
that the legal-affairs committee should simply focus
on the licensing on the tarball and the product.

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message