www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: The Ruby license (again)
Date Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:36:59 GMT
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 08:05:37PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu@offthelip.org> wrote:
> >
> > ****
> >  Can Apache projects have external dependencies on Ruby licensed works?
> >
> > A project written primarily and obviously in Ruby can have a dependency
> > either on Matz's Ruby Interpreter (MRI), or on any Gem which is licensed
> > under the Ruby license.  Of course Gems written under other licenses (such
> > as MIT) may also be OK, depending on the license.
> >  ****
> 
> If you are happy with that, I'm happy with that.  

+1 from me :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
        "Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war"  ~ John Adams

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message