www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: The Ruby license (again)
Date Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:03:15 GMT
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:36:37PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> 
> So, I would be inclined to say that for any project written primarily
> and obviously in Ruby (such as Buildr), that any dependency either on
> Matz's Ruby Interpreter (MRI), or on any Gem which is licensed under
> the Ruby license is OK.  Of course Gems written under other licenses
> (such as MIT) may also be OK, depending on the license.
> 

+1

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
        "Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war"  ~ John Adams

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message