www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
Subject Re: FW: (qpid) Diversity
Date Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:07:35 GMT
On Friday 07 March 2008 16:39, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> So the CCLA exists for those who's employment agreements would otherwise
> cause them to violate their claims made via their CLA contract.

Uhhh.... So, are we now saying that heaps of people don't need to get the CCLA 
from their employer? I thought the CCLA was the "belt and suspenders" to 
ensure that the employee has the right that he claims. Otherwise, why is the 
CCLA a matter between the employer and ASF, and not a standard document to be 
signed between the employer and employee, for the employee to keep.

Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message