Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81617 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2008 03:14:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2008 03:14:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 56600 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2008 03:14:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 56403 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2008 03:14:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 56392 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2008 03:14:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:14:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.25.139.175] (HELO srv03.codedragons.com) (85.25.139.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:13:24 +0000 Received: from [202.146.77.122] (helo=f3.local) by srv03.codedragons.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JUZJ3-0000OS-SJ for legal-discuss@apache.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:19:38 +0100 From: Niclas Hedhman To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: Licensing concern... Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:13:35 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200802271108.36816.niclas@hedhman.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802281113.36585.niclas@hedhman.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wednesday 27 February 2008 23:37, Jeffrey Thompson wrote: > The FSF recommends that when the copyright > holder wants to make it clear that bridge components can be linked with a > GPL'ed work (and this would apply to AGPL as well), they include a special > permission in the license for the AGPL code to that effect. =A0Do you kno= w if > the copyright holder is doing that? No I don't know, but I can probably ask for it. Thanks for excellent answers. Cheers =2D-=20 Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org