www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From simon <simon.kitch...@chello.at>
Subject Re: LICENSE and NOTICE files and SVN
Date Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:58:48 GMT

On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 12:14 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> That publication (even without a formal release) is still under the
> terms of our license, and because the ASF requires a couple lines
> in NOTICE for all of our projects, the LICENSE and NOTICE files must
> be in subversion (typically at the level under trunk).  The contents
> are based on the source code within that tree.
> Tweaking maven such that it appends to the NOTICE file any additional
> missing (non source tree) required notices for a particular build is
> okay, though I bet it will be error-prone.

Sorry, but after reading this several times I still don't get this. It
seems to me that the first paragraph says that we must have a static
NOTICE file, while the second says that we can have a dynamic one.

Do we require a static NOTICE file in subversion? If so, then how can it
be right to embed a dynamic one in our distribution?

If it is permitted to distribute a dynamic NOTICE in our distribution,
then why would we have to have a static one checked into subversion?

Or is it the case that we need a static NOTICE to cover the code
actually held under the project itself, but can dynamically append
NOTICE information belonging to projects it depends on (links to)?



DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message