www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Has anyone looked at the Groovy license for compatibility with Apache v2?
Date Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:41:20 GMT
On 9/16/07, Marshall Schor <msa@schor.com> wrote:
> The license is here: http://groovy.codehaus.org/license.html
> It has a limitation for products "derived from this Software".  I'm not
> sure if just "using" groovy, in the sense that you include some groovy
> source and the groovy jars that enable it to run, in your product, would
> fall under the "derived" clause.
> The limitation is to not promote/endorse your derived product using the
> name "groovy", without permission, and your product name can't include
> "groovy".
> There is a clause:
> 5. Due credit should be given to The Codehaus -
>     http://groovy.codehaus.org/

That license was a cut and paste of the Apache 1.x license a few years
ago IIRC. I saw a thread where we all voted to use ASF 2.x. e.g. if
you look in the current source trunk...


so AFAIK its now Apache 2.0. Its maybe worth pinging further, maybe
thats an old wiki page with the old license?


DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message