www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Do some committers not have CLA on file?
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:28:32 GMT
Roland Weber wrote:
> Tom Seelbach wrote:
> > This page: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas says that a signed CLA is
> > required to be on file before an individual is given commit rights, but
> > someone told me that committers listed in italics on this page:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html don't have CLA on file?
> That's what the footer of that page says:
> > Entries in italics do NOT have a signed Contributor License Agreement
> > on file (this knowledge is keyed by SVN id)
> Maybe those accounts pre-date the current CLA?

Most likely they are in the SVN auth file for the project, but
their account has not been enabled (ie: retained from the CVS/SVN
switch)... If they are actually *using* their SVN id, then the PMC
chair needs to suspend that until we get a signed iCLA.

   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
	    "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."

DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
official ASF policies and documents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message