Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94216 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 07:12:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 07:12:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 44805 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2007 07:12:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 44556 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2007 07:12:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 44545 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2007 07:12:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:12:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mwessendorf@gmail.com designates 66.249.90.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.90.179] (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (66.249.90.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:12:10 -0700 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b35so1085384ika for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:11:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=AEzhgk84iU98jsqTAhIU93P8PyLvkAF1gDj8NpUQ9kV5dU9OvOP3PtM/+PPEwIsYoNCxPsbJcMkJEYfQ9Jy9UkUrVtiW893cVWPvt7eATpWySwwL1wXP6GlQW9GWza3LiZLaPt5D1EOAPe2ec4wuL4z8dr0DHPuLftZbB4VQm98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=l6oO7pf3VpLk5MspP8laRoBsTd0K+i71gBbFLpRHkIuK5xSw7jRU2P4E9K6aUpbrdx/uMNXAggJKYylFxeC/i8OlmpLOse8EncpSh15vHD5FlmRc8F9d+wAJjNqYUTLi57QIumcR+YKwWS9HaUJWBXzSV5z61YyUheTmEyqfxR4= Received: by 10.78.180.16 with SMTP id c16mr2039921huf.1181545908826; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.184.19 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <71235db40706110011t71d0b5b3udd0b580057a19db6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:11:48 +0200 From: "Matthias Wessendorf" Sender: mwessendorf@gmail.com To: lrosen@rosenlaw.com Subject: Re: Comments on GPLv3 Cc: legal-discuss@apache.org, legal-internal@apache.org In-Reply-To: <019301c7a649$94fa8d20$6501a8c0@LROSENTOSHIBA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <019301c7a649$94fa8d20$6501a8c0@LROSENTOSHIBA> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9036cd1b615fae13 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That reads like GPL3 code can contain Apache/Eclipse licensed code. Not that Apache code can contain GPL3. Is that right? Or do I miss a point. (I am not a lawyer ;)) -M On 6/4/07, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > > > > > Here are my comments on GPLv3: > http://www.rosenlaw.com/GPLv3-Comments.htm > > > > I send this to you because I write about Apache also. > > > > /Larry -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org